Gomez-Garcia F, Ruano J, Aguilar-Luque M, Gay-Mimbrera J, Maestre-Lopez B, Sanz-Cabanillas JL, Carmona-Fernandez PJ, Gonzalez-Padilla Yards, Velez Garcia-Nieto A beneficial, Isla-Tejera B
90 days) involving the past look day plus the full publication date. Using this type of information, journals must look into requesting article writers out of SRs so you’re able to revise the literature look through to the allowed of one’s SRs. SR profiles must ascertain enough time lag within past research time of evaluations so evidence is up-to-day having active scientific choice-making.
Sources
Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G: Health-related evaluations inside health care an useful guide. Into the. Cambridge: Cambridge School Force,; 2001: step 1 online financial support (148 p.).
Chalmers I. Chapter 24: having fun with medical analysis and you can files out-of lingering products getting scientific and you may ethical demo construction, monitoring, and you will reporting. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, writers. Health-related studies inside medical care : meta-analysis in context. next ed. London: BMJ; 2001. p. 42943.
Sutton AJ, Cooper New jersey, Jones DR. Facts synthesis as key to a whole lot more defined and you can successful browse. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2009;9:31.
Beller EM, Chen JK, Wang UL, Glasziou PP. Are systematic feedback upwards-to-day in the course of guide? Syst Rev. 2013;2:36.
Palese Good, Coletti S, Dante An effective. Publication results one of the large impact foundation medical guides in 2009: a great retrospective studies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013;50(4):54351.
Tsujimoto Y, Tsujimoto H, Kataoka Y, Kimachi M, Shimizu S, Ikenoue T, Fukuma S, Yamamoto Y, Fukuhara S. Most scientific studies authored within the highest-perception periodicals failed to register the brand new standards: good meta-epidemiological studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;sixty.
Polkki T, Kanste O, Kaariainen M, Elo S, Kyngas H. New methodological top-notch health-related studies wrote inside the higher-feeling medical periodicals: a peek at the fresh books. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23(34):315thirty-two.
Bath-Hextall F, Wharrad H, Leonardi-Bee J. Teaching gadgets when you look at the evidence created routine: assessment out of recyclable learning stuff (RLOs) to own researching meta-analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2011;.
Shea Cock sucking, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, KristSTAR is actually a reputable and appropriate measurement tool to assess the newest methodological top-notch systematic analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):101320.
Riado Minguez D, Kowalski M, Vallve Odena M, Longin Pontzen D, Jelicic Kadic Good, Jeric Meters, Dosenovic S, Jakus D, Vrdoljak M, Poklepovic Pericic T, mais aussi al. Methodological and you may reporting top-notch clinical feedback had written about high positions journals in the area of aches. Anesth Analg. 2017;
Samargandi OA, Hasan H. The quality of clinical analysis available businesses: a diagnosis using AMSTAR. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(3):482e3e.
Sequeira-Byron P, Fedorowicz Z, Jagannath Va, Sharif MO. An AMSTAR assessment of Kropotkin hot girl your methodological top-notch clinical recommendations of dental health care treatments composed from the log from applied oral research (JAOS). J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(5):440eight.
Clinical reviews and you will meta-analyses to the psoriasis: part of investment present, dispute interesting and you may bibliometric indicator since predictors away from methodological high quality. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(6):1633forty-two.
Brandt JS, Downing Air conditioning, Howard DL, Kofinas JD, Chasen ST. Solution classics when you look at the obstetrics and you can gynecology: the latest 100 most often quoted record posts in the last 50 many years. In the morning J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(4):355.e1seven.
Huang Y, Mao C, Yuan J, Yang Z, Di Meters, Tam WW, Tang J. Delivery and you may epidemiological characteristics of penned individual patient investigation meta-analyses. PLoS You to definitely. 2014;9(6):e100151.
Tam WWS, Lo KKH. Khalechelvam P: Approval of PRISMA statement and you may top-notch scientific studies and you can meta-analyses wrote during the breastfeeding publications: a corner-sectional research. BMJ Unlock. 2017;7(2):e013905.
Shea Cock sucking, Bouter LM, Peterson J, Boers Yards, Andersson N, Ortiz Z, Ramsay T, Bai A beneficial, Shukla VK, Grimshaw JM. Exterior recognition out of a description product to evaluate systematic reviews (AMSTAR). PLoS You to. 2007;2(12):e1350.